DiggStatus: Digging Deep Into Digg Users' Statistics -- Page 3
December 31, 2006
The Experiment
DiggStatus Was Born
Page 2: Submission/Promotion Graph
Do Top Users Control the Front Page?
Details on Top 5,000 Submitters
Page 3: Lame Users
Does the Average User Even Try?
Counting Inactivity
Front Paging Without Friends
Page 4: DiggStatus Usage
Most Queried User Names
Queries Per IP Address
Obligatory Traffic Graph
Page 5: Summary
Conclusions
Most Digg Users Are Pretty Lame
Dollars and Cents
If I'm going to show that the Top Users get on the front page more than the average user, I should at least uncover some of the dirty secrets of Average Joe Digger. The truth is, many Digg users are nearly completely idle.
Before we jump into the statistics, I need to note that I do not have access to the stats for the entire Digg user base. My sample set consists of 10,691 users. My statistics for the Top Users are very comprehensive, but I do not have stats for the majority of "Lame Users" that did not query the DiggStatus tool with their user name. My records indicate that there is a large portion of inactivity among Digg users. However, a glance at Digg's user list shows that the inactivity is MUCH more widespread. For this reason, we need to assume that the percentage of "Lame Users" is likely to be drastically higher* than my stats will show.
Counting Inactivity
Story Submissions, or the lack thereof:
| - Number of Users who have submitted the given amount of stories |
| submitted | number of users | percentage |
| 0 |
2746
|
25.69%* |
| 1 |
999
|
9.34% |
| 2 |
631
|
5.90% |
| 3 |
530
|
4.96% |
| 4 |
442
|
4.13% |
| 5 |
331
|
3.10% |
| 6 |
295
|
2.76% |
| 7 |
270
|
2.53% |
| 8 |
229
|
2.14% |
| 9 |
223
|
2.09% |
| 10+ |
3995
|
37.37% |
this writing, there were 62430/121351 Digg Users with zero submissions,
showing 51.45% idle users. It would be safe to say that the rest of
the under 10 submission stats can be adjusted similarly.
Front Paging Without Friends
I covered how a high number of befriending users may benefit the promotion ratio. If that is true, then the opposite should also be true.
Therefore, I need to show that without befriending users, the likelihood of getting on the front page is lower.
| - Promotion Ratio |
| promotion ratio | stories promoted | |
| Everyone |
13.06%
|
38655 |
| 0 Befriending Users |
10.49%
|
1580 |
| 1 or More Befriending Users |
14.39%
|
35437 |
Well, it turns out my theory held true in this case as well. The people who submit with zero friends bring down the average promotion ratio, while people with at least one befriending user have an above average chance of getting their submissions promoted. Having people befriend you is therefore a critical factor for a successful Digg submission.
Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Submission/Promotion Graph
:: Page 3: Lame Users
Page 4: DiggStatus Usage
This site is powered by Brian's keyboard.



